From a certain point of view.

I have a hard time with creativity and art. Yes, I know writing is art, and that I’m creative with the goofy fictions and role-playing I write, but hear me out.

I’ve always wanted to be able to draw cartoons or comics. Those who knew me during high school and early college know that I tried making webcomics out of video game sprites; this was chiefly because I cannot draw at all. I wish I could adequately express my respect and jealousy towards my friends that can doodle skillfully.

RubyBastille, you have no idea how long I’ve wanted to make comics about my campaigns. Yours is fantastic.

Now, I realize that art takes many forms, and I frequently have to remind myself that even though I may not be creative in regard to sketching, I’m still able to create art using other media. Lately, I’ve learned to appreciate the art of explaining difficult or convoluted concepts in simple terms. Bill Nye, Carl Sagan, and others science popularizers display incredible craftsmanship by translating scientific literature and research into easily palatable concepts.

Coupled with my recent foray into the expansive universe of Reddit, I’ve found a new home in the “ELI5” community. Here, redditors attempt to answer difficult questions as they would to a five-year-old. Trust me, you haven’t lived until you’ve read an ELI5 explanation of what happened to Gandalf the Grey after falling with the Balrog that resulted in him becoming Galdalf the White. Spoiler alert: You’ll see a lot of words like Gil-Galad, Ilúvatar, Celebrimbor and Maiar in the in-depth discussions that follow the surprisingly simple explanations given. Consider yourselves warned.

As of this morning, I have a working knowledge of how space and time are related, why we cannot travel at the speed of light, and the importance of light being massless. Let me know if this excites you as much as if does me.

Everything, by nature of simply existing, is “moving” at the speed of light (which really has nothing to do with light: more on that later). Yes, that does include you.

Our understanding of the universe is that the way that we perceive space and time as separate things is, to be frank, wrong. They aren’t separate: the universe is made of “spacetime,” all one word. A year and a lightyear describe different things in our day to day lives, but from a physicist’s point of view, they’re actually the exact same thing (depending on what kind of physics you’re doing).

In our day to day lives, we define motion as a distance traveled over some amount of time. However, if distances and intervals of time are the exact same thing, that suddenly becomes completely meaningless. “I traveled one foot for every foot that I traveled” is an absolutely absurd statement!

The way it works is that everything in the universe travels through spacetime at some speed which I’ll call “c” for the sake of brevity. Remember, motion in spacetime is meaningless, so it makes sense that nothing could be “faster” or “slower” through spacetime than anything else. Everybody and everything travels at one foot per foot, that’s just… how it works.

Obviously, though, things do seem to have different speeds. The reason that happens is that time and space are orthogonal, which is sort of a fancy term for “at right angles to each other.” North and east, for example, are orthogonal: you can travel as far as you want directly to the north, but it’s not going to affect where you are in terms of east/west at all.

Just like how you can travel north without traveling east, you can travel through time without it affecting where you are in space. Conversely, you can travel through space without it affecting where you are in time.

You’re (presumably) sitting in your chair right now, which means you’re not traveling through space at all. Since you have to travel through spacetime at c (speed of light), though, that means all of your motion is through time.

By the way, this is why time dilation happens: something that’s moving very fast relative to you is moving through space, but since they can only travel through spacetime at c, they have to be moving more slowly through time to compensate (from your point of view).

Light, on the other hand, doesn’t travel through time at all. The reason it doesn’t is somewhat complicated, but it has to do with the fact that it has no mass.

Something that isn’t moving that has mass can have energy: that’s what E = mc2 means. Light has no mass, but it does have energy. If we plug the mass of light into E=mc2, we get 0, which makes no sense because light has energy. Hence, light can never be stationary.

Not only that, but light can never be stationary from anybody’s perspective. Since, like everything else, it travels at c through spacetime, that means all of its “spacetime speed” mustbe through space, and none of it is through time.

So, light travels at c. Not at all by coincidence, you’ll often hear c referred to as the “speed of light in a vacuum.” Really, though, it’s the speed that everything travels at, and it happens to be the speed that light travels through space at because it has no mass.

– User corpuscle634, in response to “Why does light travel?” He also explains, “What is a hadron?” “The pay gap between men and women,” and “Why can’t I just reverse magnets to make a hoverboard?”

I can honestly say, I want to be more like “corpuscle634.”

Advertisements
3 comments
  1. rubybastille said:

    Thanks for the shoutout!

    I need to reread that blurb a few times…it lost me somewhere (or sometime??) around time dilation.

    Like

  2. Emgee said:

    Hey, thanks! Now I need to find even more blogs to follow and nominate!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: